There were several interesting talks on the second day of WebExpo, but I chose “Design Patterns for Search UX in 2025.” As a UX/UI designer, I often design websites across various fields, and most of them include a search function.
At the very beginning of my career, I used to carefully research the usability of each feature a website might offer, starting with search. But over time, I shifted focus to other components and gradually overlooked search. So I was pleasantly surprised when Vitaly brought attention back to this seemingly ordinary but incredibly important topic.
He began by showing the different types of search, and there are 22 of them, to be exact! Honestly, I didn’t even realize there were so many. Also he shared insights about reading behavior:
“A person can read 250 words per minute in their native language, but very few actually choose to do so online. On average, reading 150 words takes about 30 seconds. That’s a realistic time budget.”
According to Vitaly, the most effective approach on both mobile and desktop is to keep the search box visible on the main page, not hidden behind an icon. This alone can lead to a major boost in engagement. In fact, his team improved search usage by 40% simply by doing that. Impressive!
However, it’s not just about visuals. Preparing solid metadata is just as critical. Metadata should be clean, organized, and free from duplicates. If users spend too much time trying to find what they need, engagement drops and on top of that, every unnecessary search adds to digital carbon emissions, so making a bad search is harmful for climate
Another smart tip: show suggestions after a user clicks into the search bar, not while they’re still typing. Most people look at their keyboard when typing, so early suggestions often go unnoticed. A great example is Flying Tiger. Their search bar immediately displays popular searches and relevant products right after being clicked.

Galaxus is another strong example, they provide an extensive set of filters, from basic categories to specific product features like “Gaming capabilities.” Adding product reviews into suggestions is another enhancement worth considering.
I found this topic so engaging that I looked up a video of Vitaly presenting the same theme two years ago. Much of the content was similar, but this time he wrapped up with a comprehensive Search UX Checklist with 20 things to keep in mind when designing search and a list of 75 questions (!) for UX designers to discuss with developers. I’m pretty sure developers won’t love that part, but I bet it will spark some much-needed conversations.

Overall, I was genuinely impressed by the depth and practicality of the information shared. I’ll definitely keep these principles in mind when designing the next search experience in my upcoming projects.